Wednesday, March 4, 2020

... A Bogus Patron Saint

Catmon beguiled with a bogus Patron Saint

First posted in FB on February 11, 2020, Catmon, Cebu
Below, the original Sr. San Guillermo brought by the Augustinian Recollects
From Balaanong Bahandi: Catmon's Patron Saint is St. William the Hermit 
 vs.
From the Catmon Jubilee Year Souvenir Program: Catmon's Patron Saint is St. William of Aquitaine (St. William of Gellone)?
Is Aquitania a person or a place?

There is one St. William associated with the place Aquitaine and He is St. William of Gellone. St. William of Gellone is the proper name for St. William died in the Monastery he founded situated in a place called Gellone, he died a Monk and revered by the Benedictines.

In the middle ages Saints were named after the place of their death or the place of their penitent life NOT the place of their birth. Literally, St. William of Aquitaine does not exist, is a bogus name. It should be St. William of Gellone.

In the Catmon Fiesta souvenir program, the written life story of our Patron Saint is one of dubious origin. For it consists of three different lives, the life of St. William of Gellone, the life of St. William of Maleval/the Hermit, and the life of William X Duke of Aquitaine rolled into one. The writer likened him to God with three coeternal consubstantial persons - the Father, the Son (Jesus Christ), and the Holy Spirit—as "one God in three Divine persons". While William of Aquitaine is coeternal with William of Gellone, William of Maleval, and William X. How lucky Catmon is, having a Patron Saint in three Great persons. Bogus so to say.

If the place and date of birth of our Patron Saint are unknown, how in God's name the author of the story came up with the name St. William of Aquitaine?

Who is St. William of Aquitaine? Please include him in your research and enlighten me if I am mistaken.

Our Patron Saint is venerated and revered by the Augustinians. The Augustinians were responsible for the construction of our Church in honor of a Saint in their order. They named our parish after Sr. San Guillermo de Ermitanyo, the only soldier turned Hermit among the Augustinian Saints.

Is it not nonsensical to install a Saint not in your ecclesiastical order?

Nothing's gonna stay the same forever, change is obviously here. Political landscape in the fifth district has swiftly favored a newbie in Congress, first time in history.

Catmon Fiesta Celebration is no exception to these changes. Kabog Festival was not in the menu this year and other yearly events has also abruptly shifted, to some it's an upgrade, to others a downgrade. Struggle in the political leadership is very obvious, lack of coordination resulted to lack of preparation and unpopular decisions.

Our fiesta celebration is a celebration of our faith the feast day of our Patron Saint and also the celebration of our municipality's existence and identity.

The most important part is the celebration of our faith, the celebration of our Patron Saint's death the day of his birth into heaven, and the celebration of his penitent life in a cave in the valley of Maleval. This is a tradition that should never waiver for any reason, nothing is equal and beyond.

Strengthen your Faith through knowing him personally; don't bank on hearsay and myth. This way you can adore and revere him in appropriate and most sacred manner for you know who you’re talking to. Don't talk to a myth, revering the moon, the sun, and the trees, those days are gone... don't go back to paganism. Blind and empty faith begets dark and empty promises.

Instead revere what is real and true. Help yourself in finding the truth. Do some research heartily and don't give up until you nurtured your Faith. Those who are spreading False & Blind Faith are like fallen angels ever eager looking for lost souls.

Start doing the right thing. Secure your place by defending, fighting for, and advocating the truth. You can't be wrong with the truth and it's not hard to find it. Hungry and thirst yourself with the truth, start looking for it today, begin with my references or the Balaanong Bahandi, and then go from here. Knowing Him personally is vital to your earthly and heavenly existence; his intercession is not far a reach for he dwell in you and you in him, for he is real not born out of your imagination.

There are many San Guillermo, and our Patron Saint is your burden to identify among the many. Otherwise, you're one of those fallen angels aka hypocrites injecting twisted ideas to the innocent faithful for whatever gain. Those evil intentions will not last forever, change is obviously coming and it will come for goodness sake. Truth will keep us... forever.

Monday, February 11, 2019

Catmon Church Through The Years

    
The Beginning of Philippine-Spanish Architecture

The history of Philippine architecture under the Spanish regime begins with the arrival of Miguel Lopez de Legaspi’s expedition in February 13, 1565, in Cebu island, together with the first batch of missionaries, The Augustinians. They built their first port in the country Fuerza de San Pedro now known as Fort San Pedro which became the Spanish trading outpost and stronghold for the region.

It was in the middle of 1580s the use of stones was introduced upon the discovery of stone quarries. The art of masonry was developed throughout the islands. Edifices began to be constructed of stone. Some were erected using shaped rocks and river stones. Bricks were also introduced. Different region uses different materials in building their Churches.

In Manila and central Luzon most of the buildings were made of a volcanic rock, mud and straw formed into rectangular blocks and dried in the sun. In northern Luzon brick was the essential building material; all the way down to Jolo, Sulu. Towns along the coasts of Luzon, especially from Zambales to Batangas, used roughly hewn blocks of coral stone. In the Bicol peninsula many construction took advantage of the abundant volcanic stone.

The craft of cutting stone or coral was virtually elevated into a fine art throughout the Visayas. Coral blocks fitted so accurately into each other not even a razor blade could be inserted between blocks, and was so durable that it did not have to be reinforced with anything.

More than three centuries of Spanish initiative, buildings of wood, stone, and
brick were constructed all over the archipelago, from the Batanes Islands in the north
to Tawi-Tawi in the south, from Palawan in the west to Samar in the east.
(Idea taken from http://nlpdl.nlp.gov.ph)

The 184 Years Old Church of Catmon

270 years later after Legaspi landed in Cebu, and 255 years after the stone quarry was discovered and made an integral part of the Spanish architectures, Catmon was separated from its mother parish Danao on November 2, 1835.

Cebu being part of the Visayas was known to be a place for these so-called fine crafters of cutting coral stones, no wonder Cebu’s Churches are mostly made of such precious stones, huge blocks of coral stones. When you see a church made out of this material, you can tell that this edifice is more than or a little less than 200 years old. These are the churches built by our ancestors during the Spanish era on which method no living creatures know, materials are near impossible to obtain, and skills no longer around.

Our Parish Church stands proudly and magnificently thriving above all odds brought about in 184 years of existence. The church was built with an adjacent convent, a school, and attached three-story belfry. The belfry, affording a good view of the surrounding land and sea, also used as watchtower. The bells performed many services for the community, the primary reason was to warn the parishioners of any impending danger, then, tolling the hours, calling the congregation to worship, and announcing important events. The School made of stone was called “Escuela Catolica”, remnants of this edifice can still be seen overlooking the sea and the provincial road. The old Spanish time convent was completely demolished to give way for the construction of a new rectory in 1956 during the time of Fr. Nicolas Navarro. It was also during his time that the first Church Altar renovation was implemented out of necessity. The belfry remains standing superbly as it was 184 years ago.

The main longitudinal body of the church is the nave, the central part, and is 33 fathoms long, 8 fathoms wide and 9 fathoms tall up to the ridge of its roof. The main entrance is through the huge wooden doors in front of the Church and four other wooden doors two on each side. To the left, as you enter the main door was the baptistery, where newly born babies were baptized into the Christian faith. The placing of the baptistery close to the entrance was symbolic of one’s entry into the Christian community.

Windows, I believe were made from the translucent capiz clam, which allowed light to filter through while at the same time acting as a protective barrier before it was replaced. The replacements however, are stained glass windows with different religious designs speak of evolution to progress again out of necessity.

At the far end of the sanctuary is the main altar, with its elaborate but simple design (the former). Behind the main altar was the sacristy, where the priest and his assistants put on their vestments before celebrating mass. The priest delivered his sermon from the pulpit, an elevated structure located at the side of the altar near the steps. The interior of the church is furnished with side altars, paintings, and carvings and sculptures of religious subjects, but everything was intended to focus attention on the tabernacle at the center of the main altar. One notable painting is found on the left side of the main entrance door right above the entrance to baptistery directly below the Choir Loft is said to be painted by Ricardo Avila, San Nicolas, Cebu on Dec.1937.

Parish Choirs performed at the loft just over the main entrance. Adjacent to the baptistery is the only access to the loft and belfry. All these are characteristics of a Spanish colonial tradition, which remind us of the immeasurable aspirations and unparalleled artistry of long-ago.

The Revolution of our Church Altar

Human, Time, and Nature, have conspired to erase this memory. Today,the outside wall of our church is in its original form, while inside have been spoiled by numerous developments. Tasteless Renovation which was followed by a magnificent Restoration and Preservation project in 1984 in time for the Jubilee Year. In 2018, another Unsavory Renovation of the Altar Ceiling and Wall, to me seems a cultural theater not a House of God. Again, another excessive renovation project proposal for the altar this year 2019 is in progress.






                                                                              1984                                                                                                                                                       2018                                                                              

                                                             2019 - Proposal

What’s next? In 2020?

I noticed only one set of elements gone missing, maybe because they were conspicuously standing above two opposing posts before the steps to the altar. Those exquisite Angels, where are they now? These, maybe just a few of many original items taken out of sight for reasons only those who have to do with it knows.

The Greatest Gift Ever

Why keep on changing the interior furnishing of our Church? If we want a modern looking Church, why don’t we build one? I know in my heart I can’t sway these people to reconsider, but at least I have tried, and am able to pour out my sentiments and the sentiments of those who don’t have a voice, and those who don’t have the audacity to join a long lonely quest for just preservation.

The greatest that ever gifted to us Catmonanons is our Church. I was and am very proud to talk about the amazing architectural feat of our Church. How the natives of Catmon along with the Spanish Augustinian Recollects built our Church 184 years ago. The materials used and the simple artistry applied outside and inside speaks of the Church itself, no need to elaborate.

I have seen a lot of excessively decorated Churches and they’re beautiful but extravagant, a solid reminder of how human twisted Jesus teachings on modesty. My sentiment is not about whom people support or what people prefers. My concern is about our Church being manipulated and abused by so many for so long. The idea of constant renovation already finds its way to the depths of the young generation minds and it will continue to grind until we see the last of these authentic features no more, gone forever.

The current parish priest alone renovated the altar in 2018 with audacious modifications. Many love the idea; maybe because they can no longer do anything but accept. I am one of those who believe in preservation of the past. Our Church is the last one standing, all the rest are but remnants of those glorious moments of the distant past. And again another project is looming around, maybe as of this writing the excessive altar renovation project proposal this year 2019 has already started. One parish priest, two major excessive altar “renovation” projects, is it not strange?

Another clergy will be assigned in the years to come, hopefully will not redesign and renovate the altar for the nth time. Renovation? What’s in this word? For me, I did not see improvement; all I see is destruction, vandalism, damage, defacement, despoliation, desecration, plunder, despoilment, exploitation… what else? Destroying the past comes in many faces. Renovation is one face regularly abused.

Catmonanon, suit yourself; this may be the last time you’ll see the interior original features of our church.  With the impending threat of massive interior renovation, our church will be one of those casualties of successive renovation which superimposes on the almost two centuries old defining features. Some are not seeing the importance of just maintaining or preserving the original aspects that convey the story of our past, the ancient splendid artistry so striking to ignore, but some give a little attention and fail to appreciate its unparalleled significance. So sad!

Adieu to whatever will be vandalized. Go fly with the Angels. Adieu!

 Fr. Gil Guardiario

I have nothing personal against Fr. Gil Guardiario. My first encounter with him was during the celebration of Flores De Mayo in 2015 of which I and my Wife were the respective Hermano-Hermana Mayors. He also celebrated a Mass on my Mother’s wake the night before the burial and again in my Mom’s burial, the third time I heard of him. In 2018 we were able to celebrate Catmon Fiesta with relatives, friends, and fellow Catmonanons. We attended the consecutive nine days early morning novenas, to honor our beloved Patron Saint William and in fulfillment of our personal commitment. With this, I heard Fr. Gil delivered his homily several times although I do not know him personally, his messages during the holy masses were enough for me to say that he is different from other priests just like Fr. Jonald Concha, worthy of my respect and admiration.

It’s the IDEA not the PERSON I am not in favor of. Just exercising my freedom of expression, I guess it is alive within the Roman Catholic Faith. After presenting a life story of our Patron Saint William and believing in that story all my middle life and found out later that the story is a hoax is dismay on my part. I lost a pound of trust in the people wearing the cloth and those surrounding them. Feeding false story is like making a fool out of the innocent faithful. My love and respect fading bit by bit, I can’t help it but let it out. The only reason I still go to Church is Jesus the Christ, it has been this way since childhood, grew up from a Catholic upbringing. Even if all priests lost their souls, I will still go to Church and pray. It is hard to be apologetic when you know you’re not at fault, but, if I offended anyone, I’m sorry… truly am.


God Bless!

Tuesday, January 29, 2019

Sr. San Guillermo De Catmon

                                     A Little Of History



Matter-of-Fact

Was Jesus born in Bethlehem or Nazareth? Since childhood I was taught that Jesus was born in Bethlehem in a manger, then why is Jesus called a Nazorean and a Galilean throughout the New Testament?

Feel free to share your thoughts, but for me I would rather leave this to the Religious Scholars and Historians. Not even the Church Leaders has the right answer to this. We can have a very lengthy discussion, but I’m sure we’ll arrive to naught for we have different perspective and some not even supported with facts but still believe.

Most people do not bother to trace the origins of their religion, much less their beliefs and rituals. They don’t even care if they’re introducing Juan as Pedro, or writing and passing a story of Juan to describe Pedro. Almost all faithful always believe the men in the cloth, regardless of whether they’re telling the truth or the lie. Everything that comes out from their mouth to many is real; it seems they worship the clergies more than God. Ignorance is not a virtue!

Read the Bible and understand it. Study the history of the Catholic Faith; I’m sure you will grind your teeth in disbelief. The ancient and modern histories of our Church are besieged with scandals and it continues today and is certain, tomorrow. Men in cloth are also human like us, nothing is beyond ordinary. To spread and live by the words of God is their chosen vocation. We looked up to them as a living example of Jesus Christ, but many failed us, many came up short. You have to understand, they’re only human like us. They are not Gods, don’t treat them like one.

As of this writing, the RCC Leaders are the ones needing our prayers. With the present flood of scandals that rock the RCC Faith, being our Leaders’ inept ability as the primary reason, is an affirmation they are human like us, nothing is beyond, nothing is so special.
Again, they are not Gods, don’t treat them like one. Respect is mutual!

Catmon Tree Town

Our town was named after a tree abundant during the time of the Spaniards. The legend says that a Spanish soldier asked the farmer resting under the shade of a huge beautiful tree the name of the place. The farmer did not quite understand the soldier, however answered “Catmon”, thinking the soldier was asking for the name of the tree. From then on, the place was called Catmon.

San Guillermo Parish

The Augustian Friars who came with the soldiers whose mission was to spread Christian Faith among the locals started to look for a place to build their Church, hence our Parish Church today. They named the Church after one of their venerated Saints, thus, San Guillermo Parish Church came into existence.

Excerpt from the Book "Balaanong Bahandi"

“The Church of Saint William the Hermit in Catmon, Cebu was built in November 2, 1835 by the Augustinian-Recollects after Catmon became an independent parish from Danao. The site where the church stands was the third and final place chosen by its founder, the first one of which was in Catmondaan (Old Catmon) and the second one in Sitio Manobo, Barangay Maca-as. The walls were completed by Father Manuel Gimenez in 1868; the facade and belfry by Father Ramon Miramon in 1875; and the tile roof and altars by Father Francisco Bergasa in 1879.”

The Saint

The life of our San Guillermo is of two parts, half fictional and half factual. There was no account of his birth, where he’s from, and his early life. He was said to be a French soldier, living a debauchery life common among soldiers at that time. One day he realized his sinful ways and began to ask forgiveness through prayers. He went in a pilgrimage to the tombs of the apostles at Rome and begged Pope Eugenius III to put him into a course of penance, who enjoined him in a pilgrimage to Jerusalem in the year 1145.

In 1153, he returned to Italy and was prevailed to run a monastery in the Isle of Lupocavio, in the territory of Pisa. The tepidity and irregularity of his monks were too much for him to bear, so he decided to leave and settled in Monte Pruno. In September 1155, he entered a solitude life in a cave in the wilderness of Maleval, situated in the territory of Sienna, in the diocese of Grosseto. The first four months, his hermitical life was accompanied by wild beasts, eating only the herbs on which they fed, and drank nothing but water. He slept on a bare ground and a stone for his pillow. He was discovered by the Lord of Buriano who built him a cell.

On the feast of the Epiphany, in the beginning of the year 1156, he was joined by a disciple or companion, called Albert, who lived with him to his death, which happened thirteen months after, and who has recorded the last circumstances of his life. Divine Providence moved one Renauld, a physician, to join Albert, a little before the death of the saint.

William developed a gift of miracles, and that of prophecy. Seeing his end draw near, he received the sacraments from a priest of the neighboring town of Chatillon, and died on the 10th of February, in 1157.

William the Hermit is also known as William of Malavalle and William the Great. He was Beatified by Pope Alexander III in 1174 to 1181, and Pope Innocent III Canonized him in 1202.

Is St. William the Hermit and William X are one and the same person? Possibility arises from this question.

William X Born in 1099 and Died on 9 April 1137, nicknamed the “Saint”, was Duke of Aquitaine, Duke of Gascony, and Count of Poitou from 1126 to 1137. Against the will of his own bishops, he initially supported antipope Anacletus II in the Schism of 1130, opposite the legitimate Pope Innocent II.  In 1134, Bernard of Clairvaux ,now a Saint, convinced William to drop his support to Anacletus and join Innocent, an appeal to which the duke affirmed about a year later.  In 1137, Duke William X set out from Poitiers to Bordeaux, to leave his daughters, Eleanor and Petronilla, in the charge of the Archbishop of Bordeaux, one of the Duke’s few loyal vassals who could be entrusted with the safety of his children.

Duke William joined the pilgrimage to Santiago de Compostela, to the Shrine of Saint James in northwestern Spain; however, on April 9th (Good Friday) of that same year, he was stricken with sickness and died that evening. William dictated a will on the very day he died that bequeathed his domains to Eleanor and appointed King Louis VI of France as her guardian. Some sources blamed William’s death to food poisoning.

Fiction or Fact

If you will end the story of William the X on his deathbed on April 9, 1137 then he is not the William we are looking for. But there is one narrative about William the X though not so famous story but some people talk about it.

Legend has it, that Duke William had ingeniously faked his own death and went on solitary spiritual mission. Eight years of soul searching ended when he went in a pilgrimage to the tombs of the apostles in Rome and chanced an audience with the new Pope Eugenius III begged him for absolution, who in return enjoined him in a pilgrimage to Jerusalem in the year 1145.

So the story goes. The possibility is remote but who knows? William the X might be the Aquitanian Soldier who arrived in Maleval  in 1155 and lived a hermitical penitent life. It is for this reason I believe that some other sources call him the “Saint”. If this allegory is more than just a legend, then our St. William is the Duke of Aquitaine who engineered his own death for divine reason, lived and died a saintly hermitical death in a cave in the valley of Maleval on February 10, 1157.  He must be 58 years old when he died.

The Reality

 Regardless whether our Patron Saint is William X Duke of Aquitaine or a French soldier of rank also named William is not significant. His early life is not what made Him a Saint but His hermitic penitent life. It is His penitent life worth the emulation and the glorious praises. It is His life in the cave of Maleval, people around the world honor and adore Him, ask for his intercession and pray with Him. It was that life that made Him our Patron Saint since the birth of our parish hundred eighty four years ago, Today, and Ever!

Most RCC Saints were named after the place (or how they lived their final days) they breathe their last. His last breath signifies that his earthly penitent soul is born into heaven in God’s glory.  It is for this reason; our Patron Saint is called William the Hermit! Viva Sr. San Guillermo de Ermitanyo!

Augustinians and their Churches named after St. William

Six Augustinian Friars led by Andres de Urdeneta and five others in Mexico were the first to land in the Philippines. They were the founders and the first apostles of the Catholic Faith in the country. In Cebu, the Augustinians are also the first missionaries to have arrived with Legazpi in 1565.

They established several Churches in the Philippines and named these houses of God after St. William or San Guillermo. Although these Churches have different suffixes after the St. William or the San Guillermo, all elements refer to the same Titular Head, Patron Saint William the Hermit aka William of Maleval.

The following are the St. William the Hermit Parishes in the Philippines, Feast Day is observed every 10th of February:

1. Saint William's Cathedral, Laoag City, Ilocos Norte.
2. Saint William's Parish, Talisay, Batangas, Philippines.
3. Cathedral of Saint William the Hermit, San Fernando, La Union.
4. Saint William's Parish, Passi City, Iloilo, Philippines.
5. San Guillermo Paris, Buting, Pasig City
6. San Guillermo Parish, Iponan, 9000 Cagayan de Oro City.
7. San Guillermo de Aquitania, Dalaguete, Cebu
8. San Guillermo Parish Church, Catmon, Cebu

Augustinian Saint William

There are several Saints named William in the Augustinian Order and one of them is St. William of Maleval aka St. William the Hermit, the only soldier turned hermit among them.

Naming their Churches after Saints

It is nonsensical to name their Churches after Saints not in their ecclesiastical order. Our Church Saint William must be an Augustinian Saint. Revered and venerated by the Augustinian Friars.

Feast Day of a Saint

“The word "feast" in this context does not mean "a large meal, typically a celebratory one", but instead "an annual religious celebration, a day dedicated to a particular saint".

“The system arose from the early Christian custom of commemorating each martyr annually on the DATE OF HIS OR HER DEATH, or birth into heaven, a date therefore referred to in Latin as the martyr's dies natalis ("day of birth")…”


St. William of Gellone

William of Gellone was Born in the year 755 AD and Died on May 28, 812 AD. He was too early to be the Saint we are looking for. All characters involved in the story of our San Guillermo written by a local historian reflected in the Catmon Fiesta Souvenir Program were from the 11th-12th centuries time period except for William of Gellone who was from the 8th century. William of Gellone is more than 300 years older than the rest of the characters.

St. William of Gellone to be exact was 325 years older than Pope Eugenius III who was born in 1080 AD (11th Century). Pope Eugenius III was the youngest among the individuals mentioned in the story. William of Gellone was already a Saint during the lifetime of our Patron Saint William. He is a Saint of the Benedictine Order not of the Augustinian, further substantiated the claim that He was not the Patron Saint the Augustinian Friars installed in the parish of Catmon.

References:
Some are the same as with my previous postings.

Sunday, January 20, 2019

Catmon Church Incomprehensible Journey


Our Church Incomprehensible Journey

Not long ago, the Church of Catmon was subjected to a renovation; I guess that was during the time of Fr. Sindulfo Iriarte. The renovation was spearheaded by the Association of Catmonanon Elsewhere or ACE for short. Their mission was to expose the hidden beauty of our Church and provide a significant improvement without ruining important original features, such as the stained glass windows with different religious design, and the once upon a time exquisite chandeliers hanging from the extraordinary wooden trusses.  

They got rid of the ceiling cover when they found out the gem behind, as you can see right now the original trusses and etc. made of uncut lumber of a kind of wood which you cannot avail nowadays.

They scraped off the cement finishing of the wall to expose this peculiar material commonly used by the Augustinian recollects building the walls of their churches during the time period. These materials are now scarce and hard to quarry by blocks; therefore it is almost impossible to build new structures using the same materials and methods these days. Coral stones as I was made to believe are the materials our Church was built upon. Yes, Coral Stones!

After the renovation the Church stand at its grandeur, the naked wooden trusses in the ceiling and the naked coral stone walls speak of the almost two century’s old edifice. So beautiful, so mesmerizing!

Just recently the Church Altar was renovated. The ceiling was redesigned and the whole altar was painted with different colors and lights extravagantly mounted, seems a disco pub.
This holy place is the house of God. A place of worship. Jesus was a simple man, he lived among the poor. He is the opposite of extravagance. During the last supper, Jesus used a simple cup and plate made of baked clay, or may be of stone, or of wood. Certainly not made of gold or silver. Today, Priests use a chalice made not just of any metal but gold or silver. Jesus was poor. Priests are rich. The RCC has billions of dollars in their coffer. Reality contradicts the scripture.

“Give your riches to the poor, come and follow me.” Think!

Let’s go back to our parish Church before I get carried away. I am not sure if during or before the time of our current Priest Father Gil those angels proudly standing above two opposing columns before the steps to the altar were taken down. Destroyed, trashed out, or sold? IDK!? Who was responsible? Honestly, IHNI. But the thing is somebody obliterated a more than century old effigies. Those effigies were part of our history, part of our house of God. Part of our parish. Part of what we are, who we are.
Every time a new cleric is assign, a new project would spring out. This is a sign that we are progressing. Progress is good. But let it be a progress without destruction. Do not destroy anything from a Church almost two centuries old. Do not take away something. Make this progress a factor for addition. Each project concept must be a new addition, never subtraction. Destroying the old to give way for the new one is idiotic. If you need to destroy the old to facilitate the new… please forget it, it’s not worth it!

Another project geared towards “Enhancement” of the Church Interior starting with the altar, I guess is already in progress. The Church people are appealing for your generosity to realize the project. The enhancement proposal is beautiful but excessive. They posted only pictures, no BOQ/bill of quantities. I asked Mec if he can post a BOM/bill of materials, at least from this we can generate a general idea about the project, but to no avail.
I pray that this is a preservation and enhancement project, nothing is to be destroyed.

If you are interested to donate or contribute, please contact the Church people.

God Bless!

Friday, May 13, 2016

BLIND FAITH

Halfway to this research, I sincerely asked St. William of Gellone and St. William of Maleval and all Saints and Angels, including Mama Mary, our Dear Sto. Nino, and of course Jesus to grant me the wisdom, guidance, and the courage to impart my piece to the parishioners. All entries are from many reliable sources which are mentioned in the last part of this presentation. I DO NOT WISH YOU TO BELIEVE EVERYTHING, BUT I DO PRAY FOR YOU TO FIND INTEREST IN THE SUBJECT MATTER AND DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH TO DISCOVER YOUR FAITH.

The folktale about our Patron Saint William that was passed down through the generations by the words of mouth wasn’t put into writing until 1985, during the celebration of the 150th Year of the founding of Catmon, please correct me if I am wrong. Souvenir Program called the Jubilee Year Book was designed to compensate the expenses of the celebration through paid advertisement, the program featured numerous varieties of traditional narrative from the founding of our parish to 1985. Some are based on facts and some are mythical in nature, such as The Legend of Budbud Kabog.

The life story of our Patron Saint is not a myth or a fairy tale, but an oral tradition of a true life story that was well lived, characterized by sinful errors, sacrifices, and penitence that made him a Saint. It is his story that inspires the parishioners and strengthens their faith for centuries.

Who in his right mind would write a true life story capped with his wild imagination, altered and mangled it to make it sound like the real deal? The sad thing is, the story has been published in every year’s fiesta celebration souvenir program. Nobody dares to question it; nobody cares, because nobody knows.

This gives us the notion not to rely on stories and accept it as true without doing our homework and find out the truth ourselves. We should burn our candle, dig a little deeper, and widen our understanding. To embrace Him wholeheartedly first, we have to know Him truthfully and intimately.

To write a fabricated story misled the believers, will create confusion, and will perhaps question their faith. How can we honor a Saint, not knowing who He really was? How can we idolize Him? Believing the false story and idolizing and praising Him for what He is not, is somewhat idiotic… BLIND FAITH.

The substance of the story behind the Saint is the foundation of our faith towards Him. The same as the story of Jesus Christ is the core of our faith as Christians. Without the benefit of understanding and embracing the story, what kind of a Christian would we be?

I thought my research would be meaningless, nobody told me to do so, it just happened one day without reason. The first time I read the story intimately; my interest grew and made me dig even more. I don’t know, I just felt that there is something to be straightened, something to be discovered, and something to be changed… I just didn’t realize it was in fact the beginning of something full of twists and turns, a very intricate adventure for me but worth every penny.

This presentation is mainly for the purpose of appreciating the life of St. William of Catmon and is based on facts and writings by reputable historians, from catholic encyclopedias, dictionaries of saints, and books on the lives of the saints, and reliable websites, including our very own book Balaanong Bahandi an update to the 1886 publication Breve ReseƱa. 

I neither added nor deleted anything to mangle the stories to serve my fancies; I only did retouching on some parts of the stories to make it more readable and understandable. I did not twist facts; I merely presented the stories as written by their authors.

Comments from my own perspective are mine alone; it does not reflect anybody else’s. If I have offended someone in the course of my presentation, I am very sorry; I am responsible and will accept whatever the consequence. But please, STOP deceiving the Parishioners.

Let’s take a look at the story of St. William of Gellone as characterized by the writer in our fiesta souvenir program, please refer to Case #1.


In Case #1: (Souvenir Program Story)








"St. William of Gellone is said to have gone to pilgrimage in 1130 AD per advised of Pope Eugenius III. A friend Bernard of Clairvaux helped Him reconcile with the Church after He was excommunicated for supporting Anti Pope Anacletus against the rightful authority of Pope Innocent II in the same year 1130 AD." 

CONTRADICTION based on the dates of their Birth and Death:

                        Dates of their Birth and Death

Facts:

St. William of Gellone: ___________(8th-9th Centuries)
Born: 755 AD

Died: May 28, 812 AD


Antipope Anacletus: _____________(11th-12th Centuries)
Born: 1090 AD

Died: January 25, 1138 AD


Pope Innocent II: ________________(11th-12th Century)
Born: ---

Died: September 23, 1143 AD


Pope Eugenius III: _______________(11th-12th Centuries)
Born: 1080 AD

Died: July 8, 1153 AD


St. Bernard of Clairvaux: __________(11th-12th Centuries)
Born: 1090 AD

Died: August 20, 1153 AD



SPECIFICS on Contradiction:

St. William of Gellone could not have defended the antipope Anacletus against the rightful authority of Pope Innocent II in 1130. St. Bernard of Clairvaux could not have helped St. William of Gellone to reunite himself with the Church, much more; Pope Eugenius III could not have convinced St. William of Gellone to do pilgrimage in Jerusalem for the forgiveness of his sins.

The two Popes, Bernard of Clairvaux who later became a Saint mentioned in the story including the Antipope Anacletus are more than three (3) centuries younger than St. William of Gellone, meaning more than three hundred (300) years younger. They were not born yet during the time of St. William of Gellone. How can they commune with William?

William of Gellone Duke of Aquitaine was Canonized a Saint by Pope Alexander II in 1066 and therefore was already a Saint during the era of Antipope Anacletus, Pope Innocent II, Pope Eugenius III, Bernard of Clairvaux, William of Maleval, and William X, also Duke of Aquitaine, Duke of Gascony, and Count of Poitou from 1126 to 1137.

Saint William of Gellone who was born in 755 AD (8th Century) was 325 years older than Pope Eugenius III who was born in 1080 AD (11th Century). Pope Eugenius III was the youngest among the individuals mentioned in the story. All others were living during the time period, except for William of Gellone who was already with our Almighty God and a Saint.

THEN WHO IS THIS WILLIAM Duke of Aquitaine who went to pilgrimage in 1130’s?

Citing from one of the many references, below quotation and profile are taken from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_X,_Duke_of_Aquitaine, as follows:

“William X, Duke of Aquitaine, initially supported antipope Anacletus II in the papal schism of 1130, opposite to Pope Innocent II, against the will of his own bishops. In 1134 Saint Bernard of Clairvaux convinced William to drop his support to Anacletus and join Innocent. In 1137 William joined the pilgrimage to Santiago de Compostela, but died during the trip.”

William X, called the Saint: ---------- (11th-12th Centuries)
Born: 1099
Died: 9 April 1137
Profession: Duke of Aquitaine, Duke of Gascony, and Count of Poitou from 1126 to 1137.



THREE different LIVES rolled into one:

It is very clear that the writer of the story in the fiesta souvenir program was misguided, confused, and followed his instinct, as a result compounded the life of William X to William of Gellone both were Duke of Aquitaine in a different time period.

Not only the writer compounded the life of William X to William of Gellone, but also interpolated the life of William the Hermit to William of Gellone. Three very distinct lives rolled into one, this is the story featured in the souvenir program, a hoax. Please see Case # 2.

In Case # 2, as quoted (Souvenir Program Story):




“He was later received back into the church and begged the pardon of the newly elected Pope Eugenius III who sent him to Patriarch of Jerusalem for counseling and guidance. There in a nearby cave, he began his life of penance and atonement for sins. He ate sparingly of the course black bread of the region and drank nothing but water. He slept on the bare ground and used a stone for a pillow. He underwent the severest of fastings considering himself as the worst of criminals.”

The above is very similar to the life of William the Hermit who implored the Holy Father for pardon and prescriptive penance for his sinfulness. Pope Eugenius III encouraged William to make a pilgrimage to the Holy Land in 1145.

Please read the context below taken from one of the many very reliable sources.

From the book “The Lives of the Saints, 1866” by Rev. Alban Butler (1711–73).  Volume II: February.
February 10
St. William of Maleval, Hermit, and Institutor of the Order of Gulielmites

“He is thought to have passed his youth in the army, and to have given into a licentious manner of living, too common among persons of that profession. The first accounts we have of him represent him as a holy penitent, filled with the greatest sentiments of compunction and fervour, and making a pilgrimage to the tombs of the apostles at Rome. Here he begged Pope Eugenius III to put him into a course of penance, who enjoined him a pilgrimage to Jerusalem in the year 1145.

In performing this, with great devotion, the saint spent eight years. Returning into Tuscany in 1153, he retired into a desert. He was prevailed upon to undertake the government of a monastery in the Isle of Lupocavio, in the territory of Pisa: but not being able to bear with the tepidity and irregularity of his monks, he withdrew and settled on Mount Pruno, till finding disciples there no less indocile to the severity of his discipline than the former, he was determined to pursue himself that rigorous plan of life which he had hitherto unsuccessfully proposed to others.

He pitched upon a desolate valley for this purpose, the very sight of which was sufficient to strike the most resolute with horror. It was then called the Stable of Rhodes, but since, Maleval; and is situated in the territory of Sienna, in the diocess of Grosseto. He entered this frightful solitude in September, 1155, and had no other lodging than a cave in the ground, till being discovered some months after, the lord of Buriano built him a cell. During the first four months, he had no other company but that of wild beasts, eating only the herbs on which they fed.”

“The saint in his discourses with others, always treated himself as the most infamous of criminals, and deserving the worst of deaths; and that these were his real sentiments, appeared from that extreme severity which he exercised upon himself. He lay on the bare ground: though he fed on the coarsest fare and drank nothing but water, he was very sparing in the use of each; saying, sensuality was to be feared even in the most ordinary food. Prayer, divine contemplation, and manual labour, employed his whole time.”


From the book:

                                            




 WRITER’S acknowledgement:



The (fiesta souvenir program) writer of the life story of St. William of Catmon mentioned that our Patron Saint embraced a hermitical life in a cave and subjected himself with great sacrifices as a form of penance for his sins. He later founded a Monastery.

The writer acknowledges that our Patron Saint is a Hermit not a Monk.  This expressly substantiated the story handed down from generation to generation, the very same story I’ve heard from my elders when I was a kid… that our Patron Saint is a Hermit.

In the course to support his claim that our Patron Saint is William of Gellone Duke of Aquitaine, the writer made it appear that St. William of Gellone was a Hermit in some point in his life after his pilgrimage. The writer did not disclose any statistics as to when the events transpired not even his death and where he died. William of Gellone died in the Benedictine Monastery he founded as a Monk in May 28, 812 AD. St. William of Gellone Duke of Aquitaine is a Benedictine Monk NOT an Augustinian Hermit. His life is celebrated every 28th of May the day he died NOT February 10.

From the Book BALAANONG BAHANDI:


"The book Balaanong Bahandi: Sacred Treasures of the Archdiocese of Cebu is a beautiful tome that celebrates the religious architecture, treasures, cultural heritage and faith of the Cebuanos on the occassion of the diamond jubilee of the Archdiocese of Cebu.

The book is an update to the 1886 publication Breve ReseƱa de lo que fue y de lo que es la Diocesis de Cebu en las Islas Filipinas (A Brief Account of What is and What was the Diocese of Cebu in the Philippine Islands) by Felipe Redondo, secretary to the Bishop Benito Romero de Madridejos. Redondo’s work is the most important source for those studying the history of the Diocese of Cebu during the Spanish Colonial period."

From these books, Catmon's Patron Saint is named St. William the Hermit. Saint William the Hermit is one of the three Saints named William venerated by the Augustinians who built the Church of Catmon in 1835.

From the conception, our Patron Saint was Saint William the Hermit and this was authenticated by the publication of the book BREVE RESENA in 1886, some 51 years after the start of the construction of the Catmon Church.

Saint William the Hermit was the Patron Saint of Catmon from 1835, (fortified by the publication of the book Breve Resena in 1886, and again by the recent publication of the Balaanong Bahandi,) until local historian of Catmon replaced St. William the Hermit with St. William of Gellone Duke of Aquitaine in 1985 assuming both Saints are one and the same person "out of confusion".


Saints FEAST Day:


“The word "feast" in this context does not mean "a large meal, typically a celebratory one", but instead "an annual religious celebration, a day dedicated to a particular saint".

“The system arose from the early Christian custom of commemorating each martyr annually on the DATE OF HIS OR HER DEATH, or birth into heaven, a date therefore referred to in Latin as the martyr's dies natalis ("day of birth")…”


“The Orthodox Church commemorates certain saints or sacred events in its history every day of the year. The FEAST DAY of a SAINT is GENERALLY the DATE OF HIS OR HER DEATH.”





From http://www.catholic.org/saints/faq.php:


February 10                                         May 28
Bl. Alexander of Lugo                          St. Accidia
St. Andrew                                            St. Bernard of Montjoux
St. Aponius                                           St. Caraunus
St. Austreberta                                      St. Emilius
St. Baldegundis                                     St. Heliconis
St. Erluph                                              BI. John Shert
Bl. Louise Bessay de la Voute              St. Justus of Urgel
Bl. Louise Poirier Barre                        BI. Margaret Pole
St. Paganus                                            St. Paul Hann
St. Paul and Ninety Companions          St. Podius
Bl. Pierre Fremond                                BI. Robert Johnson
St. Scholastica                                       St. Senator
St. Trumwin                                          BI. Thomas Ford
St. William of Maleval                        St. William of Gellone

From the Book BUTLER’S LIVES OF THE SAINTS:
                                         

AUGUSTIANIAN Friars:



The Church of Catmon was built by the Augustinian Missionaries in 1835. Do you agree that Augustinian Friars espoused Augustinian Saints? They built Churches in honor of their Saints. The Augustinian Saint William of Catmon was chosen by the Augustinian Friars from among their many Saints as Patron Saint of our Parish, He was a Hermit and Died on February 10, 1157 AD. His Feast Day is on the Day of His Death.

Is it possible that St. William of Gellone NOT the Patron Saint of Catmon?

St. William of Gellone Duke of Aquitaine is a Monk NOT a Hermit, He is a Saint of the Benedictine Order NOT of the Augustinian, His Feast Day is May 28 NOT February 10, these facts tells us that He is NOT Saint William assigned by the Augustinian Friars to guard and protect the parish of Catmon, therefore NOT the Saint the Church was named after.

If we base our understanding on facts, no doubt the Saint given the responsibilities to protect, guard, guide, and or help the parishioners of Catmon is Saint William of Maleval otherwise known as Saint William the Hermit and also Saint William the Great. He died a Hermit on February 10, 1157 AD, and His Order, the Hermits of Saint William known as the “Bare-Footed Friars” eventually, was incorporated into the Hermits of Saint Augustine. He is an Augustinian Saint.


CATMONANON as we are:

I chatted with some Catmonanons and some open the possibility that St. William of Gellone and ST. William of Maleval is one and the same person. Point blank, I told them that it is not possible; they walked on earth in different time period more than 300 years apart. By the time William of Maleval did his penitence William of Gellone was already a Saint.

Another possibility was in correlation with the Patron Saint of Dalaguete. Dalaguete’s Patron Saint is St. William of Aquitaine which was also subject to several disagreements among some of the parishioners. The possibility is that the writer of the story of St. William of Catmon might have entertained the idea that Dalaguete and Catmon has the same Patron Saint since they both are named William or Guillermo.

The writer should have done his research before winding up his story. He should have known that there are many Saints by the name William or Guillermo and dig up a little bit more. The writer should have considered the day of their death since traditionally Saints Feast Day is held on that day. He should have also considered the group who revered the Saint and the group of friars who built the Parish Church of Catmon. The Parish Church of Catmon was built by the Augustinian Missionaries and therefore should have named their Church after their venerated Saints.

Why would the writer made a presumption and emulate other parish’s Faith? Catmon is not Dalaguete, we have our own identity and it must be respected not to be subjugated by one’s ignorance and ineptness. Why run to Dalaguete, don’t we have our own resources?

For all we know our talents are much better than those of the writer’s out-of-town thinker. Besides, we need no thinker to know our Patron Saint, numerous reliable references from world acclaimed historians is more than enough coupled with interest and dedication.   

Research is CONTEMPLATION:

Misapplying a few facts to support a traditional myth and ignoring the reams of facts is not a research but a total sham. It’s always nonsensical to manipulate facts to promote own point of view. Whether or not we realize it, we all have certain presuppositions and biases that affect the way we view all of life and reality. To make the long story short, if you’re interested in any topic, read objective histories about it, then bring in as many primary sources as you can to test those histories, and then make a decision about what really happened based on facts.


References:

                                                     BOOKS

1.  The Lives of the Saints, 1866” by Rev. Alban Butler (1711–73).  Volume II: February.

2.  Catholic Encyclopedia


3.  Balaanong Bahandi: Sacred Treasures of the Archdiocese of Cebu

4.  Book of Saints, by the Monks of Ramsgate

5.  Our Sunday Visitor’s Encyclopedia of Saints

6.  Dictionary of Saints

7.  BIBLIOTHECA SANCTORUM WAYS (GIUST-LHUIL) PUBLISHING NEW CITY, ROME ITALY, 1966 PP.479-480

8. The Encyclopedia of the Middle Ages


                                                  WEBSITES

9.  http://www.catholic.org/saints/faq.php
10.  http://www.philstar.com/cebu-lifestyle/419255/catmon-revisited
11. http://www.britannica.com/biography/William-X
17. http://newadvent.org/cathen/15633a.htm
18. Catholic Online
22. https://sites.google.com/…/dioceseofpasigd…/list-of-parishes