The Beginning of Philippine-Spanish Architecture
The history of Philippine architecture under the Spanish
regime begins with the arrival of Miguel Lopez de Legaspi’s expedition in
February 13, 1565, in Cebu island, together with the first batch of
missionaries, The Augustinians. They built their first port in the country
Fuerza de San Pedro now known as Fort San Pedro which became the Spanish
trading outpost and stronghold for the region.
It was in the middle of 1580s the use of stones was
introduced upon the discovery of stone quarries. The art of masonry was
developed throughout the islands. Edifices began to be constructed of stone. Some
were erected using shaped rocks and river stones. Bricks were also introduced.
Different region uses different materials in building their Churches.
In Manila and central Luzon most of the buildings were made
of a volcanic rock, mud and straw formed into rectangular blocks and dried in
the sun. In northern Luzon brick was the essential building material; all the
way down to Jolo, Sulu. Towns along the coasts of Luzon, especially from
Zambales to Batangas, used roughly hewn blocks of coral stone. In the Bicol
peninsula many construction took advantage of the abundant volcanic stone.
The craft of cutting stone or coral was virtually elevated
into a fine art throughout the Visayas. Coral blocks fitted so accurately into
each other not even a razor blade could be inserted between blocks, and was so
durable that it did not have to be reinforced with anything.
More than three centuries of Spanish initiative, buildings
of wood, stone, and
brick were constructed all over the archipelago, from the
Batanes Islands in the north
to Tawi-Tawi in the south, from Palawan in the west to Samar
in the east.
(Idea taken from http://nlpdl.nlp.gov.ph)
The 184 Years Old Church of Catmon
270 years later after Legaspi landed in Cebu, and 255 years
after the stone quarry was discovered and made an integral part of the Spanish
architectures, Catmon was separated from its mother parish Danao on November 2,
1835.
Cebu being part of the Visayas was known to be a place for
these so-called fine crafters of cutting coral stones, no wonder Cebu’s
Churches are mostly made of such precious stones, huge blocks of coral stones.
When you see a church made out of this material, you can tell that this edifice
is more than or a little less than 200 years old. These are the churches built
by our ancestors during the Spanish era on which method no living creatures
know, materials are near impossible to obtain, and skills no longer around.
Our Parish Church stands proudly and magnificently thriving
above all odds brought about in 184 years of existence. The church was built
with an adjacent convent, a school, and attached three-story belfry. The
belfry, affording a good view of the surrounding land and sea, also used as
watchtower. The bells performed many services for the community, the primary
reason was to warn the parishioners of any impending danger, then, tolling the
hours, calling the congregation to worship, and announcing important events.
The School made of stone was called “Escuela Catolica”, remnants of this
edifice can still be seen overlooking the sea and the provincial road. The old
Spanish time convent was completely demolished to give way for the construction
of a new rectory in 1956 during the time of Fr. Nicolas Navarro. It was also
during his time that the first Church Altar renovation was implemented out of
necessity. The belfry remains standing superbly as it was 184 years ago.
The main longitudinal body of the church is the nave, the
central part, and is 33 fathoms long, 8 fathoms wide and 9 fathoms tall up to
the ridge of its roof. The main entrance is through the huge wooden doors in
front of the Church and four other wooden doors two on each side. To the left,
as you enter the main door was the baptistery, where newly born babies were
baptized into the Christian faith. The placing of the baptistery close to the
entrance was symbolic of one’s entry into the Christian community.
Windows, I believe were made from the translucent capiz
clam, which allowed light to filter through while at the same time acting as a
protective barrier before it was replaced. The replacements however, are
stained glass windows with different religious designs speak of evolution to
progress again out of necessity.
At the far end of the sanctuary is the main altar, with its
elaborate but simple design (the former). Behind the main altar was the
sacristy, where the priest and his assistants put on their vestments before
celebrating mass. The priest delivered his sermon from the pulpit, an elevated
structure located at the side of the altar near the steps. The interior of the
church is furnished with side altars, paintings, and carvings and sculptures of
religious subjects, but everything was intended to focus attention on the
tabernacle at the center of the main altar. One notable painting is found on
the left side of the main entrance door right above the entrance to baptistery
directly below the Choir Loft is said to be painted by Ricardo Avila, San
Nicolas, Cebu on Dec.1937.
Parish Choirs performed at the loft just over the main
entrance. Adjacent to the baptistery is the only access to the loft and belfry.
All these are characteristics of a Spanish colonial tradition, which remind us
of the immeasurable aspirations and unparalleled artistry of long-ago.
The Revolution of our Church Altar
Human, Time, and Nature, have conspired to erase this memory. Today,the outside wall of our church is in its original form, while inside have been spoiled by numerous developments. Tasteless Renovation which was followed by a magnificent Restoration and Preservation project in 1984 in time for the Jubilee Year. In 2018, another Unsavory Renovation of the Altar Ceiling and Wall, to me seems a cultural theater not a House of God. Again, another excessive renovation project proposal for the altar this year 2019 is in progress.
1984 2018
2019 - Proposal
What’s next? In 2020?
I noticed only one set of elements gone missing, maybe
because they were conspicuously standing above two opposing posts before the
steps to the altar. Those exquisite Angels, where are they now? These, maybe
just a few of many original items taken out of sight for reasons only those who
have to do with it knows.
The Greatest Gift Ever
Why keep on changing the interior furnishing of our Church?
If we want a modern looking Church, why don’t we build one? I know in my heart
I can’t sway these people to reconsider, but at least I have tried, and am able
to pour out my sentiments and the sentiments of those who don’t have a voice,
and those who don’t have the audacity to join a long lonely quest for just
preservation.
The greatest that ever gifted to us Catmonanons is our
Church. I was and am very proud to talk about the amazing architectural feat of
our Church. How the natives of Catmon along with the Spanish Augustinian
Recollects built our Church 184 years ago. The materials used and the simple artistry
applied outside and inside speaks of the Church itself, no need to elaborate.
I have seen a lot of excessively decorated Churches and
they’re beautiful but extravagant, a solid reminder of how human twisted Jesus
teachings on modesty. My sentiment is not about
whom people support or what people prefers. My concern is about our Church
being manipulated and abused by so many for so long. The idea of constant
renovation already finds its way to the depths of the young generation minds and
it will continue to grind until we see the last of these authentic features no
more, gone forever.
The current parish priest alone renovated the altar in 2018
with audacious modifications. Many love the idea; maybe because they can no
longer do anything but accept. I am one of those who believe in preservation of
the past. Our Church is the last one standing, all the rest are but remnants of
those glorious moments of the distant past. And again another project is
looming around, maybe as of this writing the excessive altar renovation project
proposal this year 2019 has already started. One parish priest, two major
excessive altar “renovation” projects, is it not strange?
Another clergy will be assigned in the years to come,
hopefully will not redesign and renovate the altar for the nth time.
Renovation? What’s in this word? For me, I did not see improvement; all I see
is destruction, vandalism, damage, defacement, despoliation, desecration,
plunder, despoilment, exploitation… what else? Destroying the past comes in
many faces. Renovation is one face regularly abused.
Catmonanon, suit yourself; this may be the last time you’ll
see the interior original features of our church. With the impending threat of massive interior
renovation, our church will be one of those casualties of successive renovation
which superimposes on the almost two centuries old defining features. Some are
not seeing the importance of just maintaining or preserving the original
aspects that convey the story of our past, the ancient splendid artistry so striking
to ignore, but some give a little attention and fail to appreciate its unparalleled
significance. So sad!
Adieu to whatever will be vandalized. Go fly with the
Angels. Adieu!
Fr. Gil Guardiario
I have nothing personal against Fr. Gil Guardiario. My first
encounter with him was during the celebration of Flores De Mayo in 2015 of
which I and my Wife were the respective Hermano-Hermana Mayors. He also celebrated
a Mass on my Mother’s wake the night before the burial and again in my Mom’s
burial, the third time I heard of him. In 2018 we were able to celebrate Catmon
Fiesta with relatives, friends, and fellow Catmonanons. We attended the consecutive
nine days early morning novenas, to honor our beloved Patron Saint William and
in fulfillment of our personal commitment. With this, I heard Fr. Gil delivered
his homily several times although I do not know him personally, his messages
during the holy masses were enough for me to say that he is different from
other priests just like Fr. Jonald Concha, worthy of my respect and admiration.
It’s the IDEA not the PERSON I am not in favor of. Just
exercising my freedom of expression, I guess it is alive within the Roman
Catholic Faith. After presenting a life story of our Patron Saint William and
believing in that story all my middle life and found out later that the story
is a hoax is dismay on my part. I lost a pound of trust in the people wearing
the cloth and those surrounding them. Feeding false story is like making a fool
out of the innocent faithful. My love and respect fading bit by bit, I can’t
help it but let it out. The only reason I still go to Church is Jesus the
Christ, it has been this way since childhood, grew up from a Catholic
upbringing. Even if all priests lost their souls, I will still go to Church and
pray. It is hard to be apologetic when you know you’re not at fault, but, if I
offended anyone, I’m sorry… truly am.
God Bless!
Note: The first altar renovation was during the time of Fr. Nicolas Navarro, it was not out of necessity as I thought. I scavenged through my old notes and found an article which I stored some years ago that contradict my impression. The first renovation was not after all an “out-of-necessity” approach but rather a result of a “one-man-illusion” starving for inclusion in the pages of history.
ReplyDeletePlease read this portion of said article:
“The parish of Catmon was created in 1835. The present church was finished in 1875. This coral stone structure was built by the people of Catmon who were trained to be masons and carpenters by Fray Juan Juseu (parish priest from 1856 to 1864). The result is a beautiful sturdy church.
This church dedicated to San Guillermo of Maleval survived World War II unscathed, as Catmon is one of the eight towns in Cebu which were untouched by the Japanese and American forces. For years, the residents of the quiet town of Catmon went up the hill where their church perched, for all the ceremonies that marked their lives: baptisms, weddings, funerals and daily masses.
Then last month, the parishioners of Catmon were aghast to see that the altar was renovated by an over eager priest who did not even consult the Parish Pastoral Council much less the rest of Catmon! The parishioners wrote the Cardinal about this and copy furnished the local newspaper. The letter quoted verbatim the conversation she had with the priest:
" Nganong giguba man nimo ang altar Padre, nga karaan man to?"
"Mao bitawng giguba kay karaan na!"
Translation:
"Father, why did you demolish the altar, it was very old?"
"I demolished it because it was very old."
The Archdiocesan Commission for the Cultural Heritage of the Church went to Catmon to investigate. True enough we found the altar area shiny with new modern tiles! The priest covered the area with plywood when construction was going on so the people did not notice what was going on. Until some parishioners peeped at the area. And so the letter to the Cardinal.
The new tiles look incongruous with the rest of the church. But the worst part of this renovation was that the priest trampled on the memories of the people. No structure is worth conserving for its aesthetic value alone. In the case of a church, any renovation, removal of items desecrates the collective memory of parishioners. This is the greater sin, the greater crime.
For those of you who have a copy of Balaanong Bahandi, you can refer to the book for pictures of the church.
It took me a month to post this. It is too painful an episode and makes me ponder on the work we do in the archdiocese. We always contend with uninformed, willful priests who think they know better than anybody. Is there a special place in hell for these people? Maybe Dante can still work out one for them!” Catmon, A Lament - louellaalix